mitophyThe evolution of mitochondria — literature phylogenies and self-updating de novo analyses

Origin of mitochondria

All analyses agree that mitochondria arose from within (or next to) the Alphaproteobacteria. Where exactly is contested, because the mitochondrial lineage — like several candidate relatives (Rickettsiales, SAR11) — has a fast-evolving, AT-rich, reduced genome, and such lineages tend to attract each other in phylogenies under simple models. The literature tab summarises the hypotheses and what each study did; the de novo tab shows a tree that is rebuilt automatically from current public data.

Hypotheses

Mitochondria sister to all (known) Alphaproteobacteria

When compositional heterogeneity is addressed — by removing/recoding compositionally biased sites, by site-heterogeneous mixture models (LG+C60, CAT-GTR, PMSF), and by adding metagenome-assembled genomes of uncultured marine alphaproteobacteria — mitochondria no longer nest inside Alphaproteobacteria but branch as the sister lineage of all sampled alphaproteobacteria (Martijn et al. 2018), or of all known Alphaproteobacteria including newer lineages (Muñoz-Gómez et al. 2022). The Rickettsiales-sister signal is interpreted as an artefact of shared AT-rich, fast-evolving genomes.

data & models
Martijn 2018: 24 mito-encoded proteins, ~100 taxa incl. 12 marine MAGs (Alpha-II, MarineAlpha), CAT-GTR + SR4/D6 recoding, compositionally biased sites removed. Muñoz-Gómez 2022: 108 markers, expanded taxon sampling incl. Alpha-II/MarineAlpha MAGs and novel free-living lineages, LG+C60+F+G, CAT-GTR, site-and-branch-heterogeneous (GHOST/heterotachy-aware) analyses.
status
Favoured by the most model-rich analyses to date; contested by Fan et al. 2020/2022 (see 'within Alphaproteobacteria').
key studies
Martijn et al. 2018; Muñoz-Gómez et al. 2022; Muñoz-Gómez et al. 2022; Roger et al. 2017

Loading…

Cladogram (branch lengths not meaningful). Orange nodes carry notes — hover them. Alphaproteobacterial backbone simplified after Muñoz-Gómez et al. 2019.

Mitochondria sister to Rickettsiales

The classical view: mitochondria are the closest relatives of the obligately intracellular Rickettsiales (Rickettsia, Anaplasma, Wolbachia…). First suggested from rRNA and later supported by the Rickettsia prowazekii genome and many concatenated-protein phylogenies. Rickettsiales share with mitochondria a reduced, AT-rich, fast-evolving genome — exactly the properties that make long-branch attraction and compositional bias a concern.

data & models
Andersson 1998: R. prowazekii genome, individual gene trees; Fitzpatrick 2006: genome-scale supertree/concatenation of α-proteobacterial genomes; Wang & Wu 2015: 29 slow-evolving proteins, site-heterogeneous CAT model, Rickettsiales-sister recovered.
status
Long-standing majority view; support tends to weaken with site-heterogeneous models, recoding and richer taxon sampling.
key studies
Andersson et al. 1998; Fitzpatrick et al. 2006; Wang & Wu 2015; Sassera et al. 2011

Loading…

Cladogram (branch lengths not meaningful). Orange nodes carry notes — hover them. Alphaproteobacterial backbone simplified after Muñoz-Gómez et al. 2019.

Mitochondria within Alphaproteobacteria, with Rickettsiales + marine Alpha-II lineages

Fan et al. (2020) argued that site-exclusion (compositional stripping) yields erratic results and instead reduced noise by systematic taxon sampling. Their trees place mitochondria robustly within Alphaproteobacteria, sharing an ancient common ancestor with Rickettsiales and the currently unclassified marine lineages (Alpha-II / MarineAlpha MAGs). Muñoz-Gómez et al. (2022) replied that this affiliation is itself an artefact of model misspecification; Fan et al. replied in turn.

data & models
Fan 2020: 3,000+ alphaproteobacterial genomes screened, systematic subsampling of taxa, cross-validation over tree series; homogeneous and mixture models without site exclusion. Geiger 2023: metabolic/gene-content approaches favouring an ancestry among free-living, aerobic Alphaproteobacteria.
status
Actively debated; the position of mitochondria relative to Rickettsiales and Alpha-II lineages remains the crux.
key studies
Fan et al. 2020; Muñoz-Gómez et al. 2022; Fan et al. 2022; Geiger et al. 2023

Loading…

Cladogram (branch lengths not meaningful). Orange nodes carry notes — hover them. Alphaproteobacterial backbone simplified after Muñoz-Gómez et al. 2019.

Mitochondria sister to SAR11 (Pelagibacterales) — historical

Thrash et al. (2011) recovered mitochondria as sister to the abundant, streamlined marine SAR11 clade, suggesting a free-living, oligotrophic ancestor. Reanalyses showed the grouping to be a compositional/long-branch artefact: SAR11 and mitochondria (and Rickettsiales) share extremely AT-rich genomes; with better models and site stripping SAR11 falls elsewhere within Alphaproteobacteria and the SAR11–mitochondria clade disappears.

data & models
Thrash 2011: concatenated protein set incl. newly sequenced SAR11 genomes, homogeneous models. Rodríguez-Ezpeleta & Embley 2012 and Viklund 2012: CAT model, recoding, removal of fast/biased sites → SAR11 not related to mitochondria.
status
Refuted; kept here as a textbook example of compositional attraction.
key studies
Thrash et al. 2011; Rodríguez-Ezpeleta & Embley 2012; Viklund et al. 2012

Loading…

Cladogram (branch lengths not meaningful). Orange nodes carry notes — hover them. Alphaproteobacterial backbone simplified after Muñoz-Gómez et al. 2019.

What differs between studies

StudyDataModel / treatmentTaxon samplingResult
Andersson et al. 1998R. prowazekii genome; single-gene and small concatenationsML/NJ, homogeneousfew α-proteobacteriaRickettsiales-sister
Fitzpatrick et al. 2006genome-scale supertree + concatenationML, homogeneous~50 α-proteobacterial genomesRickettsiales-sister
Thrash et al. 2011concatenated proteinsML/Bayesian, homogeneousadds SAR11 genomesSAR11-sister
Rodríguez-Ezpeleta & Embley 2012reanalysesCAT, recoding, site removalas aboveSAR11-sister rejected
Wang & Wu 201529 slow-evolving proteinsCAT-GTRbroad α-proteobacteriaRickettsiales-sister
Martijn et al. 201824 mito-encoded proteinsCAT-GTR + SR4/D6 recoding, biased-site removal+12 marine MAGs (Alpha-II, MarineAlpha)sister to all sampled Alphaproteobacteria
Fan et al. 2020conserved proteins, no site exclusionML incl. mixture models; taxon-subsampling seriessystematic sampling from >3,000 genomeswithin Alphaproteobacteria, with Rickettsiales + Alpha-II
Muñoz-Gómez et al. 2022108 markersLG+C60, CAT-GTR, PMSF, heterotachy-awareexpanded incl. novel free-living lineages + MAGssister to all known Alphaproteobacteria
Geiger et al. 2023metabolic gene contentpresence/absence, gene phylogeniesα-proteobacteria + MAGsancestry among free-living aerobic α-proteobacteria

Why the answer depends on the model

Mitochondrial, rickettsial and SAR11 genomes are all AT-rich, and their proteins are correspondingly enriched in amino acids encoded by AT-rich codons (F, I, K, N, Y). Site-homogeneous models (LG, WAG, JTT + Γ) assume the same amino-acid frequencies at every site and cannot distinguish shared composition from shared ancestry, so they tend to group these lineages together (long-branch attraction plus compositional attraction). Remedies used in the literature include site-heterogeneous mixture models (CAT-GTR, LG+C20–C60, PMSF), recoding amino acids into fewer classes (SR4, D6), removing the most compositionally heterogeneous sites, taxon sampling that breaks long branches (adding uncultured marine Alpha-II/MarineAlpha MAGs and free-living early-branching lineages) and heterotachy-aware branch-heterogeneous models. Different combinations lead to the different answers above; a fair reading is that the position of mitochondria at the base of, or just inside, Alphaproteobacteria remains genuinely open, with the most model-rich analyses currently favouring a sister-group relationship to all known Alphaproteobacteria (Muñoz-Gómez et al. 2022; review: Roger et al. 2017). Genome content and metabolism argue for a free-living, aerobic ancestor rather than a parasite like Rickettsia (Sassera et al. 2011; Geiger et al. 2023); host association evolved independently within Rickettsiales (Schön et al. 2022).

References

Andersson SGE, Zomorodipour A, Andersson JO, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Alsmark UCM, Podowski RM, Näslund AK, Eriksson A-S, Winkler HH, Kurland CG (1998). The genome sequence of Rickettsia prowazekii and the origin of mitochondria. Nature 396: 133–140. doi:10.1038/24094

Fitzpatrick DA, Creevey CJ, McInerney JO (2006). Genome phylogenies indicate a meaningful α-proteobacterial phylogeny and support a grouping of the mitochondria with the Rickettsiales. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 74–85. doi:10.1093/molbev/msj009

Esser C, Ahmadinejad N, Wiegand C, Rotte C, Sebastiani F, Gelius-Dietrich G, Henze K, Kretschmann E, Richly E, Leister D, Bryant D, Steel MA, Lockhart PJ, Penny D, Martin W (2004). A genome phylogeny for mitochondria among α-proteobacteria and a predominantly eubacterial ancestry of yeast nuclear genes. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1643–1660. doi:10.1093/molbev/msh160

Thrash JC, Boyd A, Huggett MJ, Grote J, Carini P, Yoder RJ, Robbertse B, Spatafora JW, Rappé MS, Giovannoni SJ (2011). Phylogenomic evidence for a common ancestor of mitochondria and the SAR11 clade. Scientific Reports 1: 13. doi:10.1038/srep00013

Rodríguez-Ezpeleta N, Embley TM (2012). The SAR11 group of alpha-proteobacteria is not related to the origin of mitochondria. PLoS ONE 7: e30520. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030520

Viklund J, Ettema TJG, Andersson SGE (2012). Independent genome reduction and phylogenetic reclassification of the oceanic SAR11 clade. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 599–615. doi:10.1093/molbev/msr203

Sassera D, Lo N, Epis S, D'Auria G, Montagna M, Comandatore F, Horner D, Peretó J, Luciano AM, Franciosi F, Ferri E, Crotti E, Bazzocchi C, Daffonchio D, Sacchi L, Moya A, Latorre A, Bandi C (2011). Phylogenomic evidence for the presence of a flagellum and cbb3 oxidase in the free-living mitochondrial ancestor. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 3285–3296. doi:10.1093/molbev/msr159

Wang Z, Wu M (2015). An integrated phylogenomic approach toward pinpointing the origin of mitochondria. Scientific Reports 5: 7949. doi:10.1038/srep07949

Martijn J, Vosseberg J, Guy L, Offre P, Ettema TJG (2018). Deep mitochondrial origin outside the sampled alphaproteobacteria. Nature 557: 101–105. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0059-5

Muñoz-Gómez SA, Hess S, Burger G, Lang BF, Susko E, Slamovits CH, Roger AJ (2019). An updated phylogeny of the Alphaproteobacteria reveals that the parasitic Rickettsiales and Holosporales have independent origins. eLife 8: e42535. doi:10.7554/eLife.42535

Fan L, Wu D, Goremykin V, Xiao J, Xu Y, Garg S, Zhang C, Martin WF, Zhu R (2020). Phylogenetic analyses with systematic taxon sampling show that mitochondria branch within Alphaproteobacteria. Nature Ecology & Evolution 4: 1213–1219. doi:10.1038/s41559-020-1239-x

Muñoz-Gómez SA, Susko E, Williamson K, Eme L, Slamovits CH, Moreira D, López-García P, Roger AJ (2022). Site-and-branch-heterogeneous analyses of an expanded dataset favour mitochondria as sister to known Alphaproteobacteria. Nature Ecology & Evolution 6: 253–262. doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01638-2

Muñoz-Gómez SA, Susko E, Williamson K, Eme L, Slamovits CH, Moreira D, López-García P, Roger AJ (2022). Phylogenetic affiliation of mitochondria with Alpha-II and Rickettsiales is an artefact. Nature Ecology & Evolution 6: 1829–1831. doi:10.1038/s41559-022-01871-3

Fan L, Wu D, Goremykin V, Trost K, Martin WF, Zhu R (2022). Reply to: Phylogenetic affiliation of mitochondria with Alpha-II and Rickettsiales is an artefact. Nature Ecology & Evolution 6: 1832–1835. doi:10.1038/s41559-022-01896-8

Schön ME, Martijn J, Vosseberg J, Köstlbacher S, Ettema TJG (2022). The evolutionary origin of host association in the Rickettsiales. Nature Microbiology 7: 1189–1199. doi:10.1038/s41564-022-01169-x

Geiger O, Sanchez-Flores A, Padilla-Gomez J, Degli Esposti M (2023). Multiple approaches of cellular metabolism define the bacterial ancestry of mitochondria. Science Advances 9: eadh0066. doi:10.1126/sciadv.adh0066

Roger AJ, Muñoz-Gómez SA, Kamikawa R (2017). The origin and diversification of mitochondria. Current Biology 27: R1177–R1192. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.015

Automated concatenated-protein tree

Current tree

103 taxa
10,199 aligned sites · 35 markers
method
IQ-TREE LG+F+G4
support
SH-aLRT
log-likelihood
-821,164.9
rooted on
outgroup (Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Bacteria)
run
2026-08-16 · profile ci · 2 min

Where do mitochondria branch?

Mitochondria (n = 42) are monophyletic (support 100). Sister group: Rickettsiales (8 genomes); support at the joining node 98.9.

Interpretation is computed automatically from the tree (see Methods) and updates with every run.

Downloads

Read with care. This automated tree uses a single concatenated matrix (35 mitochondrion-encoded proteins and their bacterial homologs) under a site-homogeneous LG+F+G4 model with IQ-TREE's fast search, without recoding, site stripping or metagenome-derived taxa. That is exactly the setting under which mitochondria are expected to be attracted to Rickettsiales (see the Literature tab). It is a reproducible, always-current baseline — not the last word. A deeper analysis (LG+C20+F+G4 with PMSF, full search, UFBoot) can be run locally with the deep profile — see below.

Loading tree…

Tip colours follow the taxonomic groups in the legend; mitochondrial genomes are labelled with the eukaryote species. Node dots: filled black ≥ 95, grey ≥ 80, hollow < 80 (SH-aLRT); node labels show the support values. Click nodes to collapse, legend entries to collapse groups, tips to open the NCBI record.

Marker occupancy

image/svg+xml Matplotlib v3.11.1, https://matplotlib.org/ atp1 atp6 atp9 cob cox1 cox2 cox3 nad1 nad11 nad2 nad3 nad4 nad4L nad5 nad6 nad7 nad8 nad9 rpl14 rpl16 rpl2 rpl5 rpl6 rpoB rpoC rps11 rps12 rps19 rps3 rps7 sdh2 sdh3 sdh4 secY tufA Tetrahymena thermophila Paramecium gigas Dictyostelium discoideum Acanthamoeba castellanii Diphylleia rotans Prototheca wickerhamii Nephroselmis olivacea Pycnococcus provasolii Monosiga brevicollis Rhodomonas salina Hemiselmis andersenii Naegleria gruberi Allomyces macrogynus Rhizophydium sp. 136 Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cyanophora paradoxa Emiliania huxleyi Reclinomonas americana Andalucia godoyi Histiona aroides Jakoba bahamiensis Jakoba libera Seculamonas ecuadoriensis Malawimonas jakobiformis Trichoplax adhaerens Homo sapiens Ancoracysta twista Cyanidioschyzon merolae Chondrus crispus Porphyra purpurea Cyanidium caldarium Cafeteria roenbergensis Synura synuroidea Phytophthora infestans Ochromonas danica Phaeodactylum tricornutum Ectocarpus siliculosus Chara vulgaris Physcomitrium patens Mesostigma viride Chlorokybus atmophyticus Marchantia polymorpha subsp. rud Burkholderia cenocepacia Ralstonia pickettii Neisseria meningitidis Nitrosomonas europaea Phenylobacterium zucineum Caulobacter vibrioides Brevundimonas subvibrioides Escherichia coli Pseudomonas aeruginosa Vibrio cholerae Xanthomonas campestris Holospora undulata Holospora obtusa Brucella melitensis Methylobacterium extorquens Agrobacterium fabrum Rhizobium etli Hyphomicrobium denitrificans Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens Mesorhizobium japonicum Rhodopseudomonas palustris Bartonella henselae Sinorhizobium meliloti Magnetococcus marinus Hyphomonas neptunium Parvularcula bermudensis Micavibrio aeruginosavorus Kiloniella laminariae Kordiimonas gwangyangensis Geminicoccus roseus Maricaulis maris Rhodothalassium salexigens Emcibacter nanhaiensis Sneathiella glossodoripedis Pelagibacter ubique Pelagibacter sp. IMCC9063 Ruegeria pomeroyi Dinoroseobacter shibae Roseobacter denitrificans Cereibacter sphaeroides Paracoccus denitrificans Rhodospirillum rubrum Rhodovibrio salinarum Gluconobacter oxydans Magnetospirillum gryphiswaldense Azospirillum brasilense Acetobacter pasteurianus Tistrella mobilis Rickettsia bellii Ehrlichia chaffeensis Neorickettsia sennetsu Midichloria mitochondrii Rickettsia prowazekii Anaplasma phagocytophilum Orientia tsutsugamushi Wolbachia pipientis Sphingobium japonicum Zymomonas mobilis Erythrobacter litoralis Sphingomonas paucimobilis Sphingomonas wittichii Marker occupancy (filled = present) — mitochondria first, then bacteria by group
Which of the 35 markers each taxon contributes (103 taxa kept with ≥ 4 markers; markers kept if present in ≥ 40% of taxa). Gene-rich protist mtDNAs (jakobids, Malawimonas, red algae, cryptophytes, stramenopiles) contribute ribosomal proteins and complex I subunits absent from animal/fungal mtDNAs.

Deep analysis (manual, site-heterogeneous model)

Deep tree

103 taxa
10,206 aligned sites · 35 markers
method
IQ-TREE LG+C20+F+G4
support
SH-aLRT / UFBoot
log-likelihood
-785,123.9
rooted on
outgroup (Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, Bacteria)
run
2026-08-15 · profile deep · 157 min

Where do mitochondria branch?

Monophyletic: True. Sister group: Rickettsiales (8); support SH-aLRT 93.6 / UFBoot 96.

Loading tree…